Steve vowing to burn the world to the ground for Bucky.
on a scale of one to ten how ashamed do you think tumblr is to have the same logo font as toddlers and tiaras
did u think i was lying
this is my sisters contacts
When i say the wrong answer in class and someone giggles
as long as this stick-flowers-in-your-beard trend is going along with actual serious contemplation of masculinity being full of bullshit sometimes and that accepting femininity is totally fine then i’m all for it
never seen awful statues?? I think u are forgetting all of Michelangelo’s attempts at sculpting women, the big queer
Damn, how could I forget?
Dented oranges are my favorite type of breast
Michel-I’ve never seen a naked woman-angelo
a moment of silence for all the little girls this halloween who had to be anna because their older sister wanted to be elsa
Did anyone else find it disturbing that the supposed “bad angel” Lucifer was the only one who cared about consent and the feelings of his vessel while Michael and his henchangels used every dirty trick in the book on Dean?
I think about this all the time.
If Lucifer treats someone better than you do, you’ve got issues
Lucifer’s honesty wasn’t born of good intentions. He knows what his reputation is, he knows that every word he says will be met with scrutiny and distrust. The only play that would work for him is honesty. He limited his interactions with Sam to things he could answer honestly without looking evil. That meant Sam would be unable to find fault with anything he said. As time went on and the “good” angels kept getting caught in lies and manipulations Lucifer would start to look like the better angel, the only one who had never lied and therefore the only one Sam could trust.
Notice how Luci controlled his conversation with Sam. Lucifer did most of the talking and said things that would trigger high emotions in Sam, which kept him from thinking clearly. This kept Sam from asking the loaded questions like “Are you planning to kill every human on the planet?” Luci stuck to topics that would paint him in a positive light while avoiding the topics that showed his true intentions of genocide. He controlled the flow of information to make him look more favorable and this is a classic manipulation technique that’s been used by every dictator in history
Lucifer is called the Father of Lies for a reason. He will say anything, promise anything, tell you whatever you need to hear to get what HE wants. He’s crafty, he’s the original Silver Tongue. He’ll tell you JUST enough truth to be believable, JUST this side of truth, with the depth of the lie just under the surface.
Besides, you know what, Lucifer didn’t actually respect consent. When Sam told him that he would kill himself before saying yes, Lucifer told Sam that he would just bring him back, and keep bringing him back. In other words, Lucifer would never let Sam die until he said yes, would hound him for eternity, and nobody in their right mind can call that good consent. It’s not that Lucifer cared about Sam’s consent, it’s that he required it.
It bothers me too that people champion Lucifer over the consent issue. He wasn’t being a good guy by asking Sam’s consent, he did it because he physically couldn’t possess Sam without consent. That was something God built into all the angels because God wanted humans to have the free will to refuse being a vessel. When Lucifer created demons he made them able to force themselves into any human they want because Lucifer hates humanity and free will. Lucifer built a race of beings that ignore consent, if he could bypass God’s programming and rip out his consent chip then he would have forced himself into Sam’s body the minute he jumped out of the pit
I adore the way Lucifer was portrayed on Supernatural but I never interpreted him as a respectable character. He’s a silver-tongued devil who was manipulating Sam because God made it impossible for Luci to take Sam by force
OH MY GOD SO MY MOM CAME OVER YESTERDAY AND USED MY COMPUTER AND I GOT THIS MESSAGE FROM HER TODAY AND I’M DYING
I CAN’T BREATHE
THESE ARE MY BOOKMARKS
THERE ARE TEARS RUNNING DOWN MY FACE
MOM I AM SO SORRY
Julie D’Aubigny was a 17th-century bisexual French opera singer and fencing master who killed or wounded at least ten men in life-or-death duels, performed nightly shows on the biggest and most highly-respected opera stage in the world, and once took the Holy Orders just so that she could sneak into a convent and shag a nun.
bisexual opera singer who killed ten men and snuck into a convent to shag a nun.
Just so y’all know, she later set that convent on fire so she and that nun could sneak out. And she seduced one of the men she’d dueled.
Also, dueling was a serious crime during her life, but the king of France essentially overturned her conviction on the grounds that the relevant law specifically referred to men.how has there never been a million stories about this badass
Why isn’t there a book and movie trilogy about HER!?
You have no idea how long I had to look before I realized this was Emma Watson and Matthew Lewis.
CAN WE TALK ABOUT HOW THAT GUY IS A DEAD RINGER FOR CHRIS EVANS THOUGH
CAN WE TALK ABOUT HOW THAT OTHER GUY IS A DEAD RINGER FOR CHRIS HEMSWORTH
*stranger mentions fandom in public*